Friday, September 25, 2015

Teaching philosophy, part II

An evolution of my teaching philosophy (many thanks to MaryAnn Widerburg, whose teaching philosophy structure helped in the re-shaping herein):

In the book Why Art Cannot Be Taught, author James Elkins attempts to explain “the curious endeavor to teach the unteachable.”  He organizes the book by several arguments ("Art can be taught, but nobody knows quite how," "Art can be taught, but it seems as if it can't be since so few students become outstanding artists," and "Art cannot be taught, but it can be fostered or helped along," among them) but the ultimate impression is that the pedagogy of art is a mystery.  The book specifically applies to college level instruction of visual arts, but many of these concerns translate quite readily to the teaching of composition and creative writing.  A writing class is necessarily very different from a differential calculus class, for example, or from a language class.  It is a brief exposure to the process.  For some students, a writing class will be an introduction to the undertaking of a much longer study.  For others, it will represent a stage in their already started journey toward becoming a writer.  For still others, and especially in the case of creative writing, it will represent a mode of expression that may one day be discarded.

My values and goals as a teacher very much reflect the idea that learning an art is a process, and that I am in the midst of the same discovery process as are my students.  I value:
1.       Writing and reading as a primary means of communication within academic, personal, and professional spheres.
2.       Writing and reading as a way to connect, both to the internal (self) and to the external (the outside world).
3.       Clear expectations for individual writing courses, with instruction specialized according to audience, purpose, and student needs. 

Always, I focus on writing as both process and product, and know that separating one from another is impossible.  Additionally, as a creative writer and a teacher of first year composition, it is important for me to acknowledge the value of both modes of writing and the differences therein.

Writing and reading as a primary means of communication within academic, personal, and professional spheres.  Writing and reading remain primary methods of dissemination for the bulk of academic work, including journal articles, theses and dissertations, and press releases.  Students often believe that writing and reading are skills mainly used in the humanities, but though much of STEM research may be done in a lab or other setting, it is the publication of this work that makes it available to a larger community of scientists, and thus continues the conversation of knowledge.  In the personal sphere, though letter writing has fallen out of favor, we still write as a means of communication (emails, texts, social media posts, and yes, letters), and we read as a way to receive this communication.  In the professional world, being able to write continues to remain crucial for workers, and the opportunities for writing have only expanded (consider here the fields of business writing, technical writing, professional writing). 
Writing and reading as a way to connect, both to the internal (self) and to the external (the outside world).    As a creative writer and a teacher of creative writing, I value writing and reading both as a means of expression and as an aesthetic entity.  Writing and reading allow access to our most private selves, and much of the curriculum of creative nonfiction operates on the belief that we don’t truly know what we believe until we try to write these beliefs.  I believe in the value of expressionist writing as a source of self-discovery, as a means to facilitate healing in the case of trauma, and as a way to connect more fully to our human experience.  When this writing is shared, and when we share in the writing of others through the act of reading, we often connect in profoundly human ways, and often, we connect to people we have never or will never meet in person. 
Clear expectations for individual writing courses, with instruction specialized according to audience, purpose, and student needs.   I also believe in clear expectations for coursework, as the reason for writing figures greatly into the process of producing a piece of writing.  Readers have different expectations for different types of writing, and learning to recognize these different expectations is crucial to becoming a successful writer.  For example, a research paper is different from a business email, and so would have a different process and a different format.  In the same way, a creative essay is different from a poem, which is different from a rhetorical analysis.  I believe that clear expectations are crucial to student success at the assignment level, at the course level, and at the level of the overall degree plan.  If, as teachers, we understand exactly the kind of writing we want students to be able to produce after finishing the course, we can better construct this course in order to scaffold these skills.  Here, too, we are able to accommodate many different forms of and purposes for writing:  if our goal for freshman composition is preparing students  to participate in the academic conversation, we prepare them for these sorts of writing (literature reviews, researched papers, even lab reports).  If our goal for a fiction workshop is to understand the facets and nuance of story, we deconstruct story and study these elements, parts in the service of a whole. 

I do feel that the focus on writing often neglects the act and skill of reading, and I hope to encourage within my students a love for the written word, a curiosity about their lives and their surroundings, and a respect for the process itself.   Research has shown that students who identify as readers are more empathetic, and have a larger referential knowledge base.  Reading is certainly a way to experience many lives that do not belong to us, and is thus enriching beyond measure.   I believe very strongly that readers become writers, in much the same way that people who like to eat learn how to cook.  And part of the process of learning to write lies in the process of learning to read, and in both a construction and a deconstruction of the craft.  But always craft is primary, and growth the goal.


No comments:

Post a Comment